当前位置:首页公务员军队文职人员招聘军队文职英语言文学->Nobodyeverwentintoacademiccirc

Nobody ever went into academic circles to make a fast fortune. Professors, especially those in medical-and technology-related fields, typically earn a fraction of what their colleagues in industry do. But suddenly, big money is starting to flow into the ivory tower, as university administrators make up to the commercial potential of academic research. And the institutions are wrestling with a whole new set of issues.

  The profits are impressive: the Association of University Technology Managers surveyed 132 universities and found that they earned a combined $576 million from patent royalties in 1998, a number that promises to keep rising dramatically. Schools like Columbia University in New York have aggressively marketed their inventions to corporations, particularly pharmaceutical and high-tech companies.

  Now Columbia is going retail—on the Web. It plans to go beyond the typical “dot. edu” model, free sites listing courses and professors’ research interests. Instead, it will offer the expertise of its faculty on a new for-profit site which will be spun off as an independent company. The site will provide free access to educational and research content, say administrators, as well as advanced features that are already available to Columbia students, such as a simulation of the construction and architecture of a French cathedral and interactive 3-D models of organic chemicals. Free pages will feed into profit-generating areas, such as online courses and seminars, and related books and tapes. Columbia executive vice president Michael Crow imagines “millions of visitors” to the new site, including retirees and students willing to pay to tap into this educational resource. “We can offer the best of what’s thought and written and researched,” says Ann Kirschner, who heads the project. Columbia also is anxious not be beaten by some of the other for-profit “knowledge sites,” such as About.com and Hungry Minds. “If they capture this space,” says Crow, “th

  • A.that they’ll not beat other educational “knowledge sites”
  • B.that the spun-off company will remain independent
  • C.that their educational resource will be tapped into
  • D.that their faculty’s brains will be picked by their competitors
查看答案 纠错
答案: D
本题解析:

细节题。从文中第三段中的“Columbia also is anxious not be beaten by some of the other for-profit ‘knowledge sites’”可知,哥伦比亚大学担心被其他提供知识的收费网站打垮,害怕学校教师的劳动成果被窃取,故D项符合题意。

更新时间:2021-10-31 21:17

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

女性,61岁,3h前上楼时突发胸骨后疼痛,伴出汗,不能缓解,既往无冠心病病史,排除心梗发生的实验室检查首选的标志物是

  • A.CK
  • B.LD
  • C.AST
  • D.ALT
  • E.Mb
查看答案
单选题

血浆凝固酶试验阳性的是

  • A.肺炎球菌
  • B.表皮葡萄球菌
  • C.金黄葡萄球菌
  • D.A群链球菌
  • E.B群链球菌
查看答案
单选题

关于肠球菌,错误的是

  • A.需在高盐(6.5%NaCl)培养
  • B.医院感染常见菌
  • C.在40%胆汁培养基中能分解七叶苷
  • D.氧化酶阴性
  • E.触酶试验阳性
查看答案
单选题

检查高压灭菌器的灭菌效果时用的生物指标是

  • A.大肠埃希菌
  • B.金黄葡萄球菌
  • C.枯草芽胞杆菌
  • D.铜绿假单胞菌
  • E.嗜热脂肪芽胞杆菌
查看答案
单选题

不宜冷藏的细菌是

  • A.脑膜炎球菌
  • B.流感嗜血杆菌
  • C.金黄葡萄球菌
  • D.百日咳鲍特菌
  • E.牛布鲁菌
查看答案
单选题

下列哪项试验不是凝集试验

  • A.血型鉴定
  • B.肥达反应
  • C.病毒血凝试验
  • D.快速血浆反应素环状卡片试验
  • E.胶体金免疫层析试验
查看答案
单选题

关于临床血清酶活力测定的下列叙述哪项是错误的

  • A.可测定产物生成量
  • B.可测定底物消耗量
  • C.测定温度为37℃
  • D.需最适pH
  • E.底物浓度高低不影响测定结果
查看答案
单选题

影响血沉的因素不包括

  • A.温度
  • B.病人是否空腹采血
  • C.血沉管位置
  • D.血沉管的内径
  • E.拉凝剂的种类与用量
查看答案
单选题

摄入未熟透的海产品后引起急性胃肠炎,表现为血水样便,其病原菌可能是

  • A.霍乱弧菌
  • B.溶藻性弧菌
  • C.副溶血弧菌
  • D.福氏志贺菌
  • E.以上均可
查看答案
单选题

抗Sm抗体与下列哪种疾病最相关

  • A.类风湿关节炎
  • B.SLE
  • C.原发性胆汁性肝硬化
  • D.皮肌炎
  • E.自身免疫性肝炎
查看答案