当前位置:首页公务员军队文职人员招聘军队文职英语言文学->ManyUnitedStatescompanieshave,

Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line of work. Since 1980 the United States international Trade Commission (ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign companies “dumped” their products in thee United States at “less than fair value.” Even when no unfair practices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief.

  Contrary to the general impression, this quest for import relief has hurt more companies than it has helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and research relationships. The complexity of these relationships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company, №. Suppose a United States-owned company establishes an overseas plant to manufacture a product while its competitor makes the same product in the United States. If the competitor can prove injury from the imports-and that the United States company received a subsidy from a foreign government to build its plant abroad-the United States company’s products will be uncompetitive in the United States, since they would be subject to duties.

  Perhaps the most brazen ease occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the United States salt industry by dumping rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations. The “United States” company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate, while the “Canadian” companies included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the second-largest domesti

  • A.Investigating allegations of unfair import competition
  • B.Granting subsidies to companies in the United States that have been injured by import competition
  • C.Recommending legislation to ensure fair trade
  • D.Identifying international corporations that wish to build plants in the United States
查看答案 纠错
答案: A
本题解析:

文章最后一段提到investigated allegations。B项Granting subsidies市政府的工作。C、D项在文章中没有提到。

更新时间:2021-11-03 08:10

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

女性,61岁,3h前上楼时突发胸骨后疼痛,伴出汗,不能缓解,既往无冠心病病史,排除心梗发生的实验室检查首选的标志物是

  • A.CK
  • B.LD
  • C.AST
  • D.ALT
  • E.Mb
查看答案
单选题

血浆凝固酶试验阳性的是

  • A.肺炎球菌
  • B.表皮葡萄球菌
  • C.金黄葡萄球菌
  • D.A群链球菌
  • E.B群链球菌
查看答案
单选题

关于肠球菌,错误的是

  • A.需在高盐(6.5%NaCl)培养
  • B.医院感染常见菌
  • C.在40%胆汁培养基中能分解七叶苷
  • D.氧化酶阴性
  • E.触酶试验阳性
查看答案
单选题

检查高压灭菌器的灭菌效果时用的生物指标是

  • A.大肠埃希菌
  • B.金黄葡萄球菌
  • C.枯草芽胞杆菌
  • D.铜绿假单胞菌
  • E.嗜热脂肪芽胞杆菌
查看答案
单选题

不宜冷藏的细菌是

  • A.脑膜炎球菌
  • B.流感嗜血杆菌
  • C.金黄葡萄球菌
  • D.百日咳鲍特菌
  • E.牛布鲁菌
查看答案
单选题

下列哪项试验不是凝集试验

  • A.血型鉴定
  • B.肥达反应
  • C.病毒血凝试验
  • D.快速血浆反应素环状卡片试验
  • E.胶体金免疫层析试验
查看答案
单选题

关于临床血清酶活力测定的下列叙述哪项是错误的

  • A.可测定产物生成量
  • B.可测定底物消耗量
  • C.测定温度为37℃
  • D.需最适pH
  • E.底物浓度高低不影响测定结果
查看答案
单选题

影响血沉的因素不包括

  • A.温度
  • B.病人是否空腹采血
  • C.血沉管位置
  • D.血沉管的内径
  • E.拉凝剂的种类与用量
查看答案
单选题

摄入未熟透的海产品后引起急性胃肠炎,表现为血水样便,其病原菌可能是

  • A.霍乱弧菌
  • B.溶藻性弧菌
  • C.副溶血弧菌
  • D.福氏志贺菌
  • E.以上均可
查看答案
单选题

抗Sm抗体与下列哪种疾病最相关

  • A.类风湿关节炎
  • B.SLE
  • C.原发性胆汁性肝硬化
  • D.皮肌炎
  • E.自身免疫性肝炎
查看答案