Read he following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written neatly on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)
It was only after I started to write a weekly column about the medical journals, and began to read scientific papers from beginning to end, that I realised just how bad much of the medical literature frequently was. I came to recognise various signs of a bad paper: the kind of paper that purports to show that people who eat more than one kilo of broccoli a week were 1.17 times more likely than those who eat less to suffer late in life from pernicious anaemia. (46) There is a great deal of this kind of nonsense in the medical journals which, when taken up by broadcasters and the lay press, generates both health scares and short-lived dietary enthusiasms.
Why is so much bad science published? A recent paper, titled “The Natural Selection of Bad Science”, published on the Royal Society’s open science website, attempts to answer this intriguing and important question. It says that the problem is not merely that people do bad science, but that our current system of career advancement positively encourages it. What is important is not truth, but publication, which has become almost an end in itself. There has been a kind of inflationary process at work: (47) nowadays anyone applying for a research post has to have published twice the number of papers that would have been required for the same post only 10 years ago. Never mind the quality, then, count the number.
(48) Attempts have been made to curb this tendency, for example, by trying to incorporate some measure of quality as well as quantity into the assessment of an applicant’s papers. This is the famed citation index, that is to say the number of times a paper has been quoted elsewhere in the scientific literature, the assumption being that an important paper will be cited more often than one of small account. (49) This would be reasonable if it were not for the fact that scientists can easily arrange to cite themselves in their future publications, or get associates to do so for them in return for similar favours.
Boiling down an individual’s output to simple metrics, such as number of publications or journal impacts, entails considerable savings in time, energy and ambiguity. Unfortunately, the long-term costs of using simple quantitative metrics to assess researcher merit are likely to be quite great. (50) If we are serious about ensuring that our science is both meaningful and reproducible, we must ensure that our institutions encourage that kind of science.
人们已试图去遏制这一趋势的发展，比如，将一定程度的质量和数量标准纳入对申请人发表的论文的评估中。
①结构分析：本句中句子主干为Attempts have been made to curb this tendency，该句为被动句，翻译时可以通过增加主语的方式，变被动为主动。按照汉语习惯，增译主语“人们”或“相关人士”。for example作插入语，可译为“比如”。②内容要点分析：可将incorporate ... into ...译为“将……纳入……”，some measure of译为“一定程度的”。
如何理解今年一季度经常账户逆差的原因和影响？
M 公司是一个无负债公司，其每年预期税息前收益为 10000 元，股东要求的 权益回报率为 16%，M 公司所得税率为 35%，但没有个人所得税，设所有交易 都在完善的资本市场中运行，问： A.M 公司的价值为多少？ B.如果 M 公司借入面值为无负债公司价值的一半的利率为 10%的债务，债务 没有风险，并且所筹集的债务资金全部用于赎回股权，则此时公司的价值变为多 少？而权益资本成本为多少
中美贸易失衡的原因并评价特朗普的贸易政策？
TF 公司正在决定是否执行其豪华办公大楼的建设决定，如果放弃该项权利可以以 5 万美 金的价格转让给开发商。该大楼建设耗资 1000 万美金，两年后可以以 1200 万美金价格卖出。 目前折现率是 10%，但可能变动为 8%或者 12%，两种情况概率对等。如果你是 TF 公司的 CEO，该如何决策？
当前你正在评估一项泰国项目。假设即期汇率1 泰铢=0.5 美金。 泰国通胀率高出美国25%， 即美国通胀 10%的时候，泰国通胀为 12.5%。该项目花费 1000 泰铢，未来三年每年产生 300 泰铢现金流，并在项目结束后以 400 泰铢卖出，该项目对应美金表示现金流适当折现率为 12%。假设相对购买力平价关系成立，求： A.该项目生命期结束预期汇率是多少？ B.该项目以美元表示的净现值是多少？以泰铢表示净现值是多少？
当预期证券市场行情将上升时，市场时机选择者将选择（）的证券组合
对于某只股票而言，判断它的价格是否被低估取决于（ ）值的大小。
某公司普通股的现金股利按照每年 5%的固定速率增长，目前该公司普通股股票的市价为 每股20元，预期下期股利为每股2元，那么该公司以当前价格发行股票筹资的成本为（ ）
