Text 3 The past five years have been a bad time to be a taxpayer in Europe.Across the continent,govemments have relied heavily on tax rises to cut budget deficits,increasing the total burden by almost 5%of GDP in France and Greece.But rather than raise taxes any further,many countries are startin8 to cut them.The European Commission reckons that the euro zone's tax-to-GDP ratio stabilised in 2013 and is now falliry;.In January France announced plans to cut payroll taxes by 30 billion.This month Italy unveiled income-tax cuts worth 10 billion for those earning less than 25,000 a year.This week Britain proposed tax cuts for most people on low or medium incomes.Ireland and Sptun are also planning tax cuts later this year.Lower taxes may be popular,but how are such giveaways being financed?Few countries have Lhe scope to borrow much more.The commission has criticised France and Spain for repeatedly missing their deficit-reduction targets,though it is not taking action agsunst them.Italy's high level of public debt,which hit 133%of GDP in 2013,has also landed it on the commission's fiscal"watch list".Instead,most countries plan to pay for their tax proposals with public-spending cuts.Italy says it will reduce spendirg by an extra 7 billion this year and save a further 2.2 billion thanks to lower yields on its debt-though these figures may prove optimistic.The politician8 hope that lower taxes will boost growth.As euro-zone countries cannot devalue or lower their own interest rates,tax cuts are one of the few ways of trimming business costs fast,says Guillaume Menuet at Citigroup.France and Italy both hope to improve their competitiveness by reducing the tax"wedge"between employers'costs and what workers actually take home.In 2012 this tax take reached nearly 50%of the payroll biU in France and Italy,against an OECD average of just 36%.Some economists doubt that cutting income tax,Italy's approach,is the best way forward.Instead,they favour slashing Europe's high employer-paid socild security charges,as France proposes to do.Ihis would directly lower labour costs,encouraging companies to hire extra workers as well as to increase their invesLmenl.That would aLso give a welcome boost to growth.
In the past half decade,Europeans have suffered from_____
细节题。根据题干in the past half decade“在过去5年”定位到首段第一句：the past five years，再根据Europeans一词定位到首段首句的Europe，确定答案来源为第一段。而首句仅仅帮助我们定位，具体答案来自下一句：Across the continenL，governments have relied heavily on tax rises to cut budget defcits.“在整个欧洲，政府严重依靠税收增长来减少预算赤字。”由此可以知道第一句提到“过去5年对于欧洲纳税人来说是一段艰难的时光”的原因，是“税收增长”，即[C]项heavy revenue“繁重的税收”。[B]budgel deficit是迷惑选项，定位句中Across the continent，govemmenls have relied heavily on tax rises to cut budget deficits．出现了[B]选项，财政赤字是政府遭遇的状况，而欧洲人面临的是繁重的税收。
如何理解今年一季度经常账户逆差的原因和影响？
M 公司是一个无负债公司，其每年预期税息前收益为 10000 元，股东要求的 权益回报率为 16%，M 公司所得税率为 35%，但没有个人所得税，设所有交易 都在完善的资本市场中运行，问： A.M 公司的价值为多少？ B.如果 M 公司借入面值为无负债公司价值的一半的利率为 10%的债务，债务 没有风险，并且所筹集的债务资金全部用于赎回股权，则此时公司的价值变为多 少？而权益资本成本为多少
中美贸易失衡的原因并评价特朗普的贸易政策？
TF 公司正在决定是否执行其豪华办公大楼的建设决定，如果放弃该项权利可以以 5 万美 金的价格转让给开发商。该大楼建设耗资 1000 万美金，两年后可以以 1200 万美金价格卖出。 目前折现率是 10%，但可能变动为 8%或者 12%，两种情况概率对等。如果你是 TF 公司的 CEO，该如何决策？
当前你正在评估一项泰国项目。假设即期汇率1 泰铢=0.5 美金。 泰国通胀率高出美国25%， 即美国通胀 10%的时候，泰国通胀为 12.5%。该项目花费 1000 泰铢，未来三年每年产生 300 泰铢现金流，并在项目结束后以 400 泰铢卖出，该项目对应美金表示现金流适当折现率为 12%。假设相对购买力平价关系成立，求： A.该项目生命期结束预期汇率是多少？ B.该项目以美元表示的净现值是多少？以泰铢表示净现值是多少？
当预期证券市场行情将上升时，市场时机选择者将选择（）的证券组合
对于某只股票而言，判断它的价格是否被低估取决于（ ）值的大小。
某公司普通股的现金股利按照每年 5%的固定速率增长，目前该公司普通股股票的市价为 每股20元，预期下期股利为每股2元，那么该公司以当前价格发行股票筹资的成本为（ ）
