当前位置:首页职业资格教师资格中学英语学科知识与教学能力->Canelectricitycausecancer?Inas

Canelectricity cause cancer?In a society that literally runs on electric power,the very idea seems preposterous.But for more than a decade,a growing band ofscientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure toelectromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies.The implications are unsettling,to say the least,since everyone comes intocontact with such fields,which are generated by everything electrical,frompower lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens.Becauseevidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory,it has beenhard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity islegitimate——or the worst kind of paranoia.

Now thealarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S.EnvironmentalProtection Agency.In the executive summary of a new scientific review,released in draft form late last week,the EPA has put forward what amounts tothe most serious government warning to date.The agency tentatively concludesthat scientific evidence“suggests a casual link”between extremely low-frequencyelectromagnetic fields--those having very long wave-lengths--and leukemia,lymphoma and brain cancer,while the report falls short of classifying ELFfields as probable carcinogens,it does identify the common 60-hertz magneticfield as“a possible,but not proven,cause of cancer in humans”.

The report is no reason topanic--or even to lost sleep.If there is a cancer risk,it is a small one.Theevidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal ofdebate within the Administration,and the EPA released it over strongobjections from the Pentagon and the White House.But now no one can deny thatthe issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.

At theheart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon:Whenan electric current passes through a wire,it generates an electromagneticfield that exerts forces on surrounding objects.For many years,scientistsdismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful,primarily becausethey are so extraordinarily weak.The ELF magnetic field generated by a videoterminal measures only a few milligauss,or about one-hundredth the strength ofthe earth's

ownmagnetic field,the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as10 kilovolts per meter,but the corresponding field induced in human cells willbe only about 1 millivolt per meter.This is far less than the electric fieldsthat the cells themselves generate.

Howcould such minuscule forces pose a health danger?The consensus used to be thatthey could not,and for decades,scientists concentrated on more powerful kindsof radiation,like X-rays,that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons outof the molecules that make up the human body.Such“ionizing”radiations havebeen clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations tocontrol emissions.

Butepidemiological studies,which find statistical associations between sets ofdata,do not prove cause and effect.Though there is a body of laboratory workshowing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animaltissues,a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths hasnever been found.

ThePentagon is far from persuaded.In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPAreport,Air Force scientists charge its authors with having“biased the entiredocument”toward proving a link.“Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer,”the Air Force concludes.“It is astonishing that the EPA would lendits imprimatur on this report.”Then Pentagon's concern is understandable.There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavyuse of some kind of electronic equipment,from huge ground-based radar towersto the defense systems built into every warship and plane.

Whatdo you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?查看材料

  • A.Theyare indifferent
  • B.Theyare worried very much
  • C.Theymay exercise prudent avoidance
  • D.Theyare shocked
查看答案 纠错
答案: C
本题解析:

推断题。全文主要围绕着人们关于电流对癌症影响的不同的观点展开叙述。因为电流是否对健康有影响这一问题仍然有争议,所以人们更可能采取谨慎的回避措施。故本题选C。

更新时间:2022-12-24 23:11

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

有“泥土诗人”之称的诗人是()。

  • A.臧克家
  • B.田间
  • C.艾青
  • D.许地山
查看答案
单选题

将下列各项按所表示年龄大小顺序排列,正确的顺序应是( )。

①不惑②垂髫③花甲④加冠⑤而立⑥古稀⑦半百

  • A.②④①⑦⑤③⑥
  • B.④②③⑥①⑦⑤
  • C.⑥⑤③②④⑦①
  • D.②④⑤①⑦③⑥
查看答案
单选题

1931年,一位给人们带来光明的科学家重病的消息牵动着世界人民的心,几十名记者为他守夜。每隔一个小时就对外发布一次消息:“灯”还亮着。这位科学家是( )。

  • A.瓦特
  • B.法拉第
  • C.爱迪生
  • D.爱因斯坦
查看答案
单选题

钱穆在评论中国古代某制度时说,它“可以培植全国人民对政治之兴味……可以团结全国各地域于一个中央之统治”,这一制度是()。

  • A.郡县制
  • B.察举制
  • C.科举制
  • D.行省制
查看答案
单选题

明朝初年强化君主专制的措施是()。

  • A.增设军机处
  • B.采用三省六部制
  • C.废除丞相.权分六部
  • D.设中书省为全国最高行政机构
查看答案
单选题

《诗经》中描绘了一个美丽清泠、朦胧迷茫的抒情境界,刻画诗人徘徊追思的形象,借助景物和意象含蓄委婉地表达相思和追怀之情的诗篇是( )。

  • A.《邶风·静女》
  • B.《周南·关睢》
  • C.《陈风·月出》
  • D.《秦风·蒹葭》
查看答案
单选题

既是俄罗斯浪漫主义的杰出代表,同时又是俄罗斯现实主义的奠基人的是( )。

  • A.果戈里
  • B.普希金
  • C.高尔基
  • D.托尔斯泰
查看答案
单选题

“今有一人,入人园圃,窃其桃李。”下列关于“园圃”的说法正确的是( )。

  • A.是双声联绵词
  • B.是叠韵联绵词
  • C.是偏义复词
  • D.是单纯词
查看答案
单选题

海涅在《德国,一个冬天的童话》中所批判的“精神的巴士底监狱”指的是( )

  • A.教会
  • B.君主政权
  • C.封建制度
  • D.德国的检查制度
查看答案
单选题

知识是个体通过与环境相互作用后获得的( )。

  • A.感受与体验
  • B.前人经验
  • C.记忆的内容
  • D.信息及其组织
查看答案